Judging & scoring
Assign judges, set weighted criteria, trimmed mean, tie-breaks, head-judge final review and an audit trail — turning subjective scoring into a reviewable process.
What it does
Weighted criteria
Define scoring criteria and weights per category; judges score each item on their own device.
Trim & tie-break
Drop the highest/lowest scores for a trimmed mean, and break ties by head judge or highest single score.
Group or full judging
Judges can score a whole category, or by group score only the seated contestants of their group.
Head-judge final review
Head judges can revise rankings and lock results; every action is written to the audit log.
Use case example
Five judges score a category on weighted criteria from their own phones; the system drops the highest and lowest for a trimmed mean, breaks a tie by highest single score, and the head judge runs a final review before locking results — with every action written to the audit log.
What organizers can configure
- Scoring criteria and weights
- Trimming (drop-extremes) rules
- Tie-break rules (head judge / highest single score)
- Judge assignment (full-category or by group) and head-judge permissions
What contestants & judges see
- Judges see their own per-criterion scoresheet with submit-and-lock
- Head judges see ranking review, locking and a full audit log
Related use cases
Ready to run your contest on the platform?
Book a demo and we'll walk your contest type from registration to certificate.
Other modules: Registration · Contestant center · Dynamic rule engine · Certificate verification · QR check-in · Sponsor management · Multilingual system · Reports & CRM